SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 15N NOESY-HSQC | 100 | 6.3 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
2 | 13C NOESYHSQC | 100 | 6.3 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
3 | 13C NOESY-TROSY | 100 | 6.3 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
4 | HNHA | 100 | 6.3 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
5 | HCACO[N] | 100 | 6.3 | 1 atm | 298 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Varian | INOVA | 750 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
SIMULATED ANNEALING, RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS | RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS WAS USED IN THE REFINEMENT PROTOCOL. | X-PLOR |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | LOWEST ENERGY |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 200 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 35 |
Representative Model | 9 (n/a) |
Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
---|---|
Details | THE ENSEMBLE WAS DETERMINED USING 3D TRIPLE RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY USING SINGLE AND DOUBLE-LABELED PDZ2. |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | X-PLOR | BRUNGER | |
2 | structure solution | X-PLOR |